Construction
Porter Scott’s construction attorneys possess extensive experience representing public and private clients in construction-related matters, including the successful management of multimillion-dollar claims. The firm provides legal services to developers, general contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, owners, and design professionals, assisting with the preparation, defense, and prosecution of a wide range of construction disputes.
Our Construction Unit’s Areas of Expertise
Construction defect
Construction contract disputes
Bonding issues and disputes
Errors and omissions claims against design professionals
Indemnity claims
Mechanics’ liens, stop notices and collection matters
Mold litigation defense
Site accidents
Roadway design and maintenance
Errors and omissions disputes
Attorneys
Case Victories
Represented one of the nation’s largest bridge builders against the State of California involving multi-million dollar claims pertaining to air quality issues concerning construction equipment. Case resolved favorably for client prior to trial.
Represented one of the nation’s largest bridge builders against the State of California involving multi-million dollar claims pertaining to air quality issues concerning construction equipment. Case resolved favorably for client prior to trial.
Obtained a $2.48 million dollar settlement on behalf of a developer/owner for construction defects at a large apartment complex.
Obtained settlements to date exceeding $1,000,000 for the owner of an ultra large single family residential property to cover construction defects, the case continues against remaining defendants.
Successfully defended target defendant involved in construction defects totaling an alleged $100 million at a Northern California Indian Casino.
Successfully defended client who acted in capacity of developer, architect, general contractor, framer and structural engineer of residential development to verdict following 21-day jury trial.
Successfully defended roofing contractor in trial by obtaining a virtual defense verdict. Plaintiff had demanded more than $100,000 in damages. Jury awarded merely $128.40 against the Defendant roofing contractor. Verdict upheld on appeal on behalf of roofing contractor.
Obtained a defense judgment for local auto dealership after a 5-day jury trial against one of California’s largest consumer rights litigation firms. Complaint alleged violations of state and federal consumer protection laws, including breach of implied warranty, also known as “Magnuson-Moss” claims.
Summary judgment was granted by the United States District Court arising out of a cross-claim on an adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court. Read more about this case.
Successfully represented plaintiff as prevailing party in a jury trial involving construction defects at plaintiff’s residence exceeding 10,000 square feet.
